Wednesday, November 22, 2006
You've heard it, but did it sink in?
Tuesday, November 21, 2006
The War on Terror...
Which is one of my biggest issues w/ the Shrubbery Administration - it's based on stupidity, fear mongering, lies and limiting the publics access to knowledge.
Now that the Dem's have control of the US Congress, we'll see if they stand-up and start trying to steer this nation back to a path of reason and fact, or if they just act like politicians. Not going to hold my breath on that one.
Monday, October 30, 2006
Disagree with the Bush Administration, Go to Jail
on June 16, Steve Howards was walking his 7-year-old son to a piano practice, when he saw Cheney surrounded by a group of people in an outdoor mall area, shaking hands and posing for pictures with several people...
Howards and his son walked to about two-to-three feet from where Cheney was standing, and said to the vice president, "I think your policies in Iraq are
reprehensible," or words to that effect, then walked on.
Ten minutes later, according to Howards' lawsuit, he and his son were walking back through the same area, when they were approached by Secret Service agent Virgil D. "Gus" Reichle Jr., who asked Howards if he had "assaulted" the vice president. Howards denied doing so, but was nonetheless placed in handcuffs and taken to the Eagle County Jail.
What - they didn't drop him to the ground 2 seconds after he said it, punch his lights out, and take the kid as well?
Kevin Tillman, brother of San Jose native son and Iraq War fatality, Pat Tillman, put it well in a SJ Mercury News Perspective on Sunday:
Somehow subversion of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution is tolerated.
Somehow suspension of habeas corpus is supposed to keep this country safe.
Somehow torture is tolerated.
Somehow lying is tolerated.
Somehow reason is being discarded for faith, dogma and nonsense.
Maybe this years election will change things. Or will we just give up the illusion of a democracy, and crown the Shrub "King Bush"?
Tuesday, October 17, 2006
The Rule of Law vs. The Rule of Power
Couple of ridiculous points:
Removing the concept of the "rule of law", with the US Courts as the ultimate arbiter of what is and isn't allowed (enemy combatants would have no right to sue for being improperly held / charged / treated), is truly un-American. Nothing makes the attacks of 9/11 have more impact than if we throw out our democratic ways in the process of fighting terrorism. Even Americans, detained on US soil, could be labelled "enemy combatants", and never have a chance to a non-military tribunal, where hear-say and dubious evidence (resulting from "non-torture" interrogation techniques, including beatings, sleep and food deprivation, etc. Not allowed by US Military code of conduct, but the CIA has their own methods...)
"If we did enough" - we could bomb the rest of the world (ok - we'll keep Britain and Australia, our staunchest allies, and maybe Israel) and that would greatly reduce the chance of future attacks on America. Is that enough?
A key concepts in the Geneva Convention is that a common set of standards to apply to everyone. If Al Qaida capture American soldiers, tried them without proper legal representation, and then executed them, Americans would be horrified at their barbarism. Only difference is the Military commissions Act of 2006 allows us to do it as a government.
And, the law is retro-active, so it applies to any / all exhisting detainee's lawsuits in US court.
Monday, September 25, 2006
When did Clinton join the WWF, and the SmackDown move to Fox?
But, things have quieted down, so it's back to internal US politics for now. Which means lies, more lies, and the Republican effort to guide the world with "truthiness". I can't say for sure, but I guess they think it's easier to make stuff up, and then invent the stories to support it, then to actually deal with what's happened, and their part in it. Gheez - reminds me of a lot of the idiot managers at the company I work for - easier to whitewash the BS that happened then to fess up that it came from them.
Not a regular Fox News watcher (since "Fox News" has become as oxy-moronic as "Jumbo Prawns"), I didn't catch Clinton on Fox News Sunday (transcript here), but did see the Video on Think Progress
Short review:
(a) Bill Clinton is, and was, a much more intelligent and informed speaker than George W. Bush is, was, or ever will be.
(b) Despite his peccadilloes, he still has more honesty and integrity than, hehe, that mistake for a homo sapien.
(c) Chris Wallace, the Fox News interviewer, thought he (Chris) would get a slam dunk out of his "why didn't you take care of Osama Bin Laden" slam to President Clinton. But Chris forgot something very important - make sure you got a better game than your opposition. Unlike Shrub, nobody ever accused Slick Willy of being an idiot, or even just average thinker. If you're going to invite a moderate-liberal onto the most right leaning main stream media news show, and expect to sucker punch him (or her), then pick someone who hasn't been around the block as much as President Clinton.
Chris got schooled. He's just lucky he's not Bill's type, and the only stains on his clothes afterwards were in his jockeys, and not down the front of his shirt!